Chris Corrigan Chris Corrigan Menu
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me

Category Archives "Leadership"

Five good principles for organizational transformation

January 28, 2016 By Chris Corrigan Collaboration, Complexity, Design, Leadership, Learning, Organization

In the complex space, Paul Hobcraft shares some very good guiding principles, but the whole post shimmers with good advice about transformation, and is applicable to movement building, network organizing and enterprise.

Today corporate transformations must be designed and executed quickly and routinely—not as once-a-decade events. Management teams are looking for best practices that increase speed and reduce the risk of pursuing business model innovation and change. That’s where minimum viable transformation comes into play. Before diving in, management teams should consider these five principles:

1. Learn how to learn. The central goal of minimum viable transformation is to learn from a true field experiment.

2. Pick up speed. There’s a reason this approach starts with the word “minimum”: The learning has to happen fast. As soon as a company executes the idea it’s pursuing, it shows its hand to competitors— who will quickly respond with their own strategies.

3. Embrace constraints. Much has been written about the counter-intuitive effect of constraints—they don’t foil creativity, but fuel it. It’s worth noting that the very constraints we’ve been talking about here—few bells and whistles and scarce time—take real creativity to address. At the very least, they compel a focus on the goal—the need to learn and reduce risk around the key objective.

4. Have a hypothesis. To succeed, transformation initiatives must clearly articulate both the need for change and its direction. Such a statement of direction helps identify key assumptions driving the change effort (assumptions that will need to be tested and refined along the way). Leaders will also need to develop metrics that measure short-term progress.

5. Start at the edge. Find an “edge” of the current business—a promising arena that can showcase the potential of a fundamentally different, highly scalable business model that could even become a new core. Starting at the edge gives the transformation team far more freedom to test and experiment, and more ability to learn and react quickly.

In short, these five key principles can help bypass traditional barriers to transformation, ultimately supporting more effective response to mounting performance pressures.

via Deeper read or quick summary- finding the time | Paul4innovating’s Innovation Views.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Working with your tie off: apprenticeship and reality

January 5, 2016 By Chris Corrigan Culture, Flow, Leadership, Organization, Stories One Comment

I remember when I worked in the federal government, one of my roles was acting as part of an internal facilitation team. This team was put together by a director in who had an interest in organizational development. This was back in the late 1990s and we didn’t really have in house OD units which was a blessing.  Instead we had this team of people that were interested in systems thinking, development and facilitation and we were made available by our bosses to do work within the organization. I cut a lot of my hosting teeth in that context.

I remember that we once led a little informal experiment. We were finding that much of what we heard when we ran sessions in the organization was platitudes of a kind of aspired set of values and stories. But when you went on the road with people, especially senior people, you’d get the real stories. This is where anyone wanting to go into management was going to get their real mentorship training. My job involved a lot of travel so I heard a lot of these stories.

We called these “tie off” stories, because when senior managers travelled in the public service at that time, they used to take their ties off and just wear an open collar shirt and a blazer.  (This seems to have become a mark of high status these days, but back then it was a kind of relaxing of protocol) When the tie came off the stories flowed.  And travelling around remote British Columbia communities pre-World Wide Web and smartphone, means you get a lot of time kicking back in hotel bars and airports and avalanche detours.  With no Netflix to watch, no mobiles to check and no email to get through, there was nothing left but storytelling. (By the way, I rarely learned anything deeply personal about people in these settings.  Personal stories were strictly available only when your senior manager was completely casual. I learned early on that the uniforms of business are like the gels used in the theatre lighting to change the colour of the stage light: suits and jeans and ties filtered the person.  People were always “authentic” but their uniforms constrained and shaped what was coming through.)

A small group of us resolved to spend a year listening to these stories and comparing them to stuff we heard in formal planning processes and at the end of a year we basically concluded that there were two different organizations: one that was a performance for the bean counters and the accountability police, all tidied up into reports, memos and budgets and the other which was a mess of story, rumour, gossip, cobbled together work-arounds, covered up failures and surprising results. When citizens wonder why government seems to be such a mess of bureaucratic boondoggle, saying one thing and doing another, they are noticing an actual phenomenon.  Part of the reason for this phenomenon is that the second set of characteristics and stories is how things actually get done, but the first set is the story the public (and the Minister) wants to hear.

You cannot have innovative change without a mess. And very few organizations, especially it seems in the public sector, allow for mess making to happen.  Whatever we learn, it has to be packaged up into something neat and simple, and preferably replicable. It bothers me to this day that citizens demand one without the other.  I think citizens need to be a bit more grateful about the way public servants get things done in spite of the overwhelming demand to simplify processes and guarantee results in what is a massively complex job.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The simplest facilitation tip to build group capacity

December 10, 2015 By Chris Corrigan Facilitation, Leadership, Open Space 5 Comments

Thinking that the facilitator has the answers is one of the biggest problems with the way people are entrained to relate to facilitators.  Because you are guiding a process, many people will feel that you are also an authority on what to do.  They will often stop and ask questions about how things are going to work.

Imagine: you have just done an elegant and energetic Open Space opening and you are ready to hand the process over to the group.  You have slowly and clearly explained the instructions.  You have showed everyone how the process works.  You have restated the theme of the gathering to refocus everyone on the task at hand.  Just as you start to walk out of the circle and let the group take over, a hand goes up “Excuse me, but what if no one comes to my session?”  And then another “Yes and what happens if there are two things going on at the same time and I want to do both ”  And so on…

Here you have a choice.  Answering the questions stops everything.  And truthfully your answer SHOULD be “I don’t know” but you are also trapped in the pattern of “facilitator as expert” and so you try to answer…”well, you could wait a while and see who comes…and you, you can move around between sessions or maybe see if you can get a session moved to another time slot….”

“Yes but what if…”

And on it goes.  And you are not getting to work.  And those that are ready are also not getting to work, which is REALLY frustrating because what you are actually doing is indulging people’s anxieties.  Anytime you answer a question about a hypothetical situation, you are not helping.  You are entraining the group into your perceived expertise instead of letting them discover possibilities on their own.

So there is a better choice and it’s one that I’ve been using for a couple of years now.  In the second before you let people get to work you ask the group a question: “Put your hand up if you have enough clarity from the instruction I just gave to get down to work.”  Many, many hands should go up.  Invite people to keep their hands up, and then utter these magic words.

“If any of you have questions about the process, ask these people.”  And then remove yourself from the situation.

This does two things.  First it immediately makes visible how many people are ready to get going and that shows everyone that any further delay is just getting in the way of work.  And second, it helps people who are confused to see that there are people all around them that can help them out.  And that is the simplest way to make a group’s capacity visible and active.

You will have to brave a little fire from time to time.  Even after doing this recently I had a person say “Can I just ask a question for clarification, though?” to which I replied “no.”  She was shocked.  I let people get to work and then went over to talk to her myself.

“What can I help you with?”

She got a little angry.  “I had a question about notes.”

“Sure what is it?”

“Well I’m not going to ask it now.  I think it was a question that the whole group should have heard.”

You need to help people see that their anxiety and their ego are a potent mix.  It may well have been a great question about taking notes.  It may well have been valuable on some level for everyone to hear.  But almost certainly it would not have been more valuable than the group becoming aware of its own capacity and getting down to work.  And if I couldn’t answer the question one on one, then I was left wondering if it wasn’t just going to be some clever grandstanding.

Getting myself out of the middle of the work is hard not only because my ego gets tickled a little by my own role, but because other people’s egos conspire to keep me in the middle.  Ever since I have used this technique, turning the group’s attention to its own resourcefulness has never failed.

And as a shameless plug, we’ll cover more techniques like this in my Open Space Technology facilitator training June 2-3, 2016 in Vancouver.  I hate adding commercials at the end of a blog post, but click on through if this is something you’d like to learn more about!

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Limiting beliefs

November 4, 2015 By Chris Corrigan Complexity, Facilitation, Leadership, Practice One Comment

in most of our leadership training work and our strategic work with Harvest Moon, we devote at least a half day to working with limiting beleifs using a process developed by Byron Katie called simply The Work.

At its simplest, the work is a process of inquiring into limiting beliefs that are unhelpful in our work and lives.  Such beliefs often include judgements, ideologies and other beliefs that prevent us from really seeing the reality we are dealing with.   Some of these beliefs are so strong that we take them for granted – such as “Richard shouldn’t have punched Eric” which is an excellent example of an espoused belief that crumbles in the face of the reality that Eric was just punched by Richard.  As anyone with teenagers knows, just saying something “should” or “shouldn’t” happen is no guarantee that it will or won’t, and is an utter denial of what just did happen (or didn’t!).  Any statement that contains “should” is an argument with reality.

Every time we enter into complexity work with clients we confront limiting beliefs: this won’t work, we’ve already tried it, it’s impossible, the boss will kill it, we don’t know what to do, the answer has to be clear, and so on.  Limiting beliefs do a couple of things.  First they limit thinking by exerting a powerful constraint over the mind that, left unquestioned, makes us narrow our ability to scan of possibilities.  And second, they cognitively entrain our thinking with unhelful attractors, so that when the boss enters the room, so do all our thoughts about the boss’s resourcefulness and support.  Doing creative work with unquestioned beliefes in the way is near impossible.

The way to deal with this kind of thinking is, not surprisingly, informed by complexity practice.  So this means that it won’t work to ask a direct question about that belief.  Addressing situations head on is a good strategy for complicated problems but a poor strategy for complex ones.  And entrained brains will always game the system.  In practice this misapplication looks like adopting an affirmation or something like “I will be kinder towards my boss” that doesn’t shift thinking at all, and in fact can bury the resent and anger directed at the boss that will come out in some passive aggressive .form when you least expect it or least desire it.

instead we inquire into the the thought by looking at how a belief lines up with reality, and then looking at what happens when we are believing thoughts – how our body, emotions and behaviours are influenced when a belief is active in our mind.  From there we engage in a powerful set of exercises called “turnarounds” in which we investigate beliefs from different angles.  After that, we simply sit and let the mind settle.  there is no action plan.  We are not fixing problems, we are rewiring our cognition.  It’s a simple practice, but it works because we take an oblique approach to addressing the constraints, attractors and solidified identities that limit our ability to do good work in complex and uncertain environments.

It has been very cool developing this practice with my partner Caitlin Frost who is a master facilitator and teacher of this work.  As I have been exploring the world of complexity-based design, I have been seeing more and more how this process is a strong complexity-based approach to addressed constraints and cognitive entrainment in our thinking.  It’s a key piece of strategic capacity building.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

You’re not at good at failure as you think you are.

October 27, 2015 By Chris Corrigan Being, Complexity, Featured, Improv, Leadership, Practice 3 Comments

Somehow that statement is worth keeping nearby in my work.  For me and everyone I work with.

I spend a lot of time working with people who need or want to do something new.  And no level of new work – innovation, boundary breaking, next levelling or shifting – is possible without failure.  A lot of it. Much more often than not.

Today, working with 37 leaders from human social services and government in our Leadership 2020 program, Caitlin asked a question: “How many of you have bosses that say it’s okay to fail?  How many of you have said to your staff, it’s okay to fail?  How many of you have given permission to yourself to fail?”  No surprise.  No hands up.

There are many reasons for this, the least of which is that people equate failure in this system with the actual death of a human being.  When that is the thought you associate with failing, of course you will never put yourself in a position where failure is an option, let alone likely.  And yet, it’s impossible to create new things that work right out of the box.  You need to build testing and failing into strategy if you are to build new programs and services that are effective.

This is where understanding the scale at which you are working helps: hence probe, prototype, pilot, program, process…five incrementally more robust and more “fail-safe” (in terms of tolerance) approaches to innovating and creating something new.  But just having a process or a tool for innovating – whether it is Cynefin, design labs, social innovation, agile, whatever – is still not going to give you a resilient mindset in which failure is tolerable or possible.  And this is as true for leaders as it is for people working on the project teams that are supposed to be delivering new and better ways of caring for children and families.

In our programs and in our teaching, we double down on working with improvisational theatre and music techniques and especially The Work, which Caitlin teaches and leads.  That process is the primary tool we use with ourselves and others to work on the limiting beliefs, patterns, thoughts and cognitive entrainment that impedes our ability to embrace failure based approaches.  Without addressing patterns of thinking, it is just never safe to fail, and when a change leader is hidden behind that block, there is no way to truly enter into strategic, innovative practice.

How do you sharpen your failure practice?

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 57

Find Interesting Things
Events
  • Art of Hosting November 12-14, 2025, with Caitlin Frost, Kelly Poirier and Kris Archie Vancouver, Canada
  • The Art of Hosting and Reimagining Education, October 16-19, Elgin Ontario Canada, with Jenn Williams, Cédric Jamet and Troy Maracle
Resources
  • A list of books in my library
  • Facilitation Resources
  • Open Space Resources
  • Planning an Open Space Technology meeting
SIGN UP

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
  

Find Interesting Things

© 2015 Chris Corrigan. All rights reserved. | Site by Square Wave Studio

%d