Chris Corrigan Chris Corrigan Menu
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me

Category Archives "Collaboration"

The river is full

May 12, 2011 By Chris Corrigan Collaboration, Conversation, Poetry

Back in Monticello, Minnesota on the banks of the Mississippi River where we are running the third residential learning session in collaborative leadership for a cohort of groups working to improve health in their communities.

The river is high here, and the channel is full.  Downstream, in the rest of the United States, the Mississippi is challenging communities and families who are in a fierce struggle to learn how to live with the river’s whims, with the river’s power and its overwhelming desire to renew the floodplains that stretch away from the main channel.

Sitting by the river yesterday it felt right to offer a blessing to the water so that as it travelled it would use its fullness for good, and it occurred to me that at the end of this nine month period of training and working together, our participants are also full and ready to move out and do serious work.  So the dialogue poem I wrote this morning, a harvest of the check in circle, was offered as a blessing to the river of leadership that was flowing through this room.

I have grown more open

to new ways of working and meeting

collaborating, fabricating ideas

I have a garden where I relax

and am relaxed about taking time

having fun while I get things done.

 

Gradually graduating

expanding myself settling myself

knowing you as friends, partners and allies

tend to what’s starting, the group that tries to change the world

starts the work.

 

The river connects us,

sends a shiver of recognition

through names that come down to us

between the banks,

a thanks that is my privilege to offer

to this little village.

 

This is a space of learning,

earning my knowledge in a community that cares

moving forward together further than I ever dared to go

on my own.

I am always asking, who is not here?  What do we need to be clear?

Together we can act without fear.

 

The process is here

and the chance to mentor is at hand.

It’s a transition that is sad on the one hand

but I’m glad to use the ning thing and get face to face

to learn how much more we can do.

 

I have comfort and peace, sitting in this chair

much more aware of my triggers and cues

so I know it’s not just a brainwashing ruse.

 

Instead it seeps into my work,

creeps into my practice, charms and disarms,

I came here guarded and shy

but over time I have started to fly with new skills,

more at home than I ever thought I’d be

in the chaordic space of discovery.

 

My art has been liberated,

and I can draw on the inspiration of the heart.

 

Just to come and sit in a room of friends

is an end in itself.  But a space that gives so much learning

is the space I have been yearning for.

I’ve learned to fit and use this space to reclaim sanity

that has eluded me in my daily life.

I was feisty when I arrived, wanting to bust through walls,

but now what calls is a gentle opening of doors

and I see so much more.

 

Your stories change me and my work.  Change is good

and growth is inevitable, even though what we are doing is unexplainable,

people know it has worth.

 

Communicating and collaborating I’m more self aware,

living without fear,

whether tending bar and slinging beer, there is a resilient wealth

that comes in my work public health.

 

I’m hip to this flip in ways of working

with sedated conversation, co-created presentation,

collective self-preservation.

 

Thankful and appreciative.  I am no longer alone.  These four I brought from home

mean the world to me.  This has been like the blossoming of bulbs

the flowers reaching for the light through the occasional dump of snow,

always rising, always knowing that the spring is coming

that the flower will open and our power will rise into a glorious summer.

 

I am more aligned and intentional

more present and keeping a sentinel watch

over what old Swedes and Norwegians can do

posting statements on the doors that we will no longer go through,

and leaving notes about where else we will go, what else we will do.

 

My story has been one of complication,

each retreat has resulted in an emergency

some urgency that has resulted in surgery.

And that is true in community too, where we have focused on

what needs to be done…we can laugh now, but it isn’t always fun.

 

The truth is that we sometimes lose body parts that you can’t see,

we are working on invisible health disparities,

privilege and white supremacy channeling the energy

of discomfort from anger to resiliency, and working change to create opportunities

for long term change sustainability.

 

When I walked in here to see the circle

I knew the work was here, the task is to braid together

what we have made together, but I already grieve

for what we will leave behind when we go home,

and I don’t want to be alone.

 

I feel worthy to practice here.

The further I walk down the path of vague notions

the more I find oceans of possibility releasing into

 

In the car, we pool our learning, drink from the clear water

that we found in the place where we now ground ourselves

knowing that we can break patterns and do anything together.

 

Clarity and calm, and growing personally

has been a healing balm for me own growth and learning;

ideas rearranged by being with strangers

who are friends now and who chatter in the back of the van

that is speeding forward toward.

 

I can sit here through sun, rain and snow,

see the community that grows

from thirty kind hearts, sat beside a river that ever flows.

 

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Walk Out Walk On…the hit single!

May 4, 2011 By Chris Corrigan BC, Collaboration, Community, Emergence, Music

 

Hard on the heels of Deborah Frieze and Meg Wheatley’s new book Walk Out Walk On comes a commissioned single from my mates Tim Merry and Marc Durkee by the same name.  Tim and Marc have beenmaking poems and music for the past five years or so about the work we all do in the world.  THis is a great sounding track, and covers what it is we do in a beautiful and inspiring way.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

What it’s like to make change

May 2, 2011 By Chris Corrigan BC, Collaboration, Community, Emergence, First Nations, Leadership 6 Comments

Just off a call where we were discussing what it takes to shift paradigms in indigenous social development. We noted that we hear a lot from people that they are busy and challenged and they need clear paths forward otherwise they are wasting their time.

I have a response to that.

We don’t know what we are doing.  Everything we have been doing so far has resulted in what we have now.  The work of social change – paradigm shifting social innovation – is not easy, clear or efficient.  If you are up for it you will confront some of the the following, all of the time:

  • Confusion about what we are doing.
  • A temptation to blame others for where we are at.
  • Conflict with people that tell you you are wasting their time.
  • A feeling of being lost, overwhelmed or hopeless.
  • Fear that if you try something and it fails, you will be fired, excluded or removed.
  • Demands for accountability and reprimands if things don’t work out.
  • Worry that you are wasting your time and that things are not going according to plan.
  • A reluctance to pour yourself into something in case it fails.
  • A reticence to look at behaviours that are holding you back.

Social change is not easy.  Asking for it to be made easy is not fair.  Leadership in this field needs to be able to host all of these emotional states, and to help people hold each other through very trying times.  It is about  resilience, the kind that is needed both when things fall apart AND when things take too long to come back together.

Everyone needs to be a leader here, everyone needs to recognize these states in themselves and hold others in compassion when they see them arising in others.  Working with the emergent unknown requires pacing, a big heart, and a stout challenge.  To create the experiments that help us forward we need to be gentle with judgment, but fiercely committed to harvesting and learning.  We need to cultivate nuance, discernment, advocacy and inquiry rather than jumping to conclusions and demanding rational analytical responses to every situation.

You up for that?

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The true bottom line in business is life.

March 30, 2011 By Chris Corrigan Collaboration, Emergence, Organization

My friend Michelle Holliday has been devoting her life the past few years to understanding living systems and bringing her learning to organizational settings.  She’s been with us at two Art of Hostings and has brought a wonderful group to both events.  Here is her slideshare on her recent thinking and above is a TEDxTalk she gave in Montreal.  I love the way she sees hosting practices as pathways for action as organizations move to living systems approaches.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Acting resourcefully in a space of community organizing

March 4, 2011 By Chris Corrigan Art of Hosting, BC, Collaboration, Community, Leadership, Organization 2 Comments

A space for community leadership and action

This past week I have been in Minnesota working with colleagues Jerry Nagel, Ginny Belden-Charles and Mandy Ellerton.  We were conducting a second residential training in collaborative leadership with a number of planning grantees working in communities to make impacts on the social and economic determinants of health.

In this residential we spent a fair bit of time working on tactical community organizing, exploring how to teach this from the perspective of the Art of Hosting.  The traditional tactics of Alinsky-style community organizing operate by creating strategic targets for action and mobilizing community power against those targets.  It’s a zero-sum game.  In the Art of Hosting community and the Berkana models of community organizing, we generally focus on purpose and seek to build strategic relationships and structures that create longer term, resilient and sustainable responses to changing realities.  The challenge for us as teachers in this was to explore and find a way to teach both so that we could help people become resourceful practitioners of a multitude of strategies.

Both have value.  Recent events in the Middle East, as well as down the road from us in Wisconsin showed the need and power for traditional community organizing to respond to acute injustice and to take advantage of timing.  And while mass occupations of public spaces and state Capitols have their place, they will flare out if the participants cannot find a way to use power to sustainably and wisely over time.  The danger with many revolutionary movements is that they seize power and later exercise it without changing the nature of the power dynamics itself.  Top-down remains top-down, and the patterns of leadership and power-sharing remain in place.  For revolutions of any kind to be truly transformative they have to work on both levels – visible power dynamics and underlying patterns that generate those dynamics.

There is a great temptation to reduce this space into a dualistic “love vs. power” choice.  Adam Kahane’s recent work has explored this dichotomy from a position of how love and power can be complimentary resources in leadership practice.  If you ask people, many will privilege one over the other.  “You can’t expect autocrats to be toppled by love alone – you need to gain power.”  Others will say that “the destructive exercise of power is what got us into this situation, and only building relationships based on love and respect will get us back.”  Or as Martin Luther King famously said: ““Power without love is reckless and abusive, and love without power is sentimental and anemic.”  In our group we had people who reacted in a strongly negative fashion to a discussion of power, because they perceived themselves as victims of power.  In other situations I have found people will dismiss love as “sickly and anemic” and unable to make any real change at all.  Reducing any of these dimensions to an either/or proposition will immediately drop you into a space of unresourcefulness, and that is NOT what we were after.

On our teaching team, we were well set to explore this dynamic.  Both Jerry and Mandy have experience in traditional community organizing tactics, Alinsky-style tactical work in communities and organizing traditional political campaigns.  Ginny and I are both students and practitioners of relational community development, both of us working a lot lately with using community building principles to work with change.  And each of us has experience and curiosity about the other end of the spectrum so we were well placed to figure out an inclusive and transcendent framework that could be useful for our participants.

We began by defining some of the dimensions of a leadership space in which tactical action for mutual influence takes place.  In other words, what kinds of strategies are useful for influencing people and participating pro-actively in change?  We found three dimensions of action, which we set up as polarities:

Inquiry – Advocacy. From the world of systems thinking, this set of skills is well known.  Balancing advocacy and inquiry is a key area for personal mastery to participate in deeper and transformational dialogue.  Advocacy requires clear speaking, storytelling and compelling argument on behalf of oneself or a group.  Inquiry requires openness, curiosity and a willingness to listen and be changed by what you hear.    It is the domain of good, clear, non-judgemental questions.

Transactional – Relational. A transactional view sees the world as a space for negotiation, for winning and losing and where separation is useful.  Relational practices and worldviews on the other hand bring us into each other’s sphere of influence in a way that builds sustainable alliances and systems of influence.  It is important to engage in transactional activity sometimes, escaping from dangerous situations, demanding that an autocrat hand over power (and even seizing it from the person), negotiating and creating separate spaces of safety such as women’s centres, immigrant services, Aboriginal choice schools or First Nations governments.  But for sustainability and co-evolution, relational tactics are important, building community around purpose. reintegrating a movement with society, letting go of a defined community of practice to allow emergence to take social innovation to the scale of an influential system.

Individual – Collective. Another key dimension that we discovered that gives the model a great deal of power and depth.  There are times for individual actions and times for collective actions.  Individual leadership can be power and visionary, the image of Obama as President.  A powerful speaker can invoke what is called in Halkomelem “nautsamaut” – a powerful holistic collective single mindedness.  On the other hand, people cannot work alone, and collective intelligence and effort is needed to undertake large scale and meaningful transformations.

If you place these three axes in relation to each other, you get a sphere, and that sphere becomes what we called “a space for action.”  Within that sphere, many tactics and actions can happen, and depending on context, the actions will be considered right or wrong.  Our goal then became exploring this space with an eye to creating resourcefulness in any given moment.

For example, the revolution in Egypt last month was a result of collective action based on relational strategies which took a transactional approach to shifting power in the state.  Collective leadership assembled, demands were articulated, and Mubarak’s resignation was demanded.  There was no place for relationship building with the old regime.  By the time Mubarak held out his olive branch it was too late.  The people wanted him gone and they wanted the power that was concentrated in his office to be moved to the people through a democratic constitution-building process.  In this example there was no room for individual, relational inquiry.  It was not the time for solo self reflection.  Nor was there much in the way of a sole leader of the opposition movement.  Democratic revolutions of this nature tend to have the occasional figure head (ElBaradei, Mandela, Havel, Gandhi, King,Tsvangarei) but the movement is run by groups and really powered by a mass of people.  In situations where autocrats are overthrown by powerful individual figures (think Haiti, Cuba, Soviet Union, China, Liberia, Afghanistan, Zaire, Yugoslavia) the results become less democratic than autocratic, and often result in civil war rather than a peaceful transition of power.

Another example.  On my home island, Bowen Island, we are currently engaged in a process to determine the feasibility of establishing a national park on our island.  This has been a controversial proposal as it emanated not from a groundswell movement, but from a few hard working municipal councillors, some community advocates and the federal government.  For the citizens of Bowen, the conversation has been vigorous and at times acrimonious as we faced an apparently dualistic decision between a future with a national aprk, or a future without one.  We are a small community and relationships are very important.  Many islands and small bounded communities have been torn apart by poorly handled land use processes.  For us to succeed we need to not fall into the trap of advocacy for positions (especially as there is so little that can be known about the implications of either a park or a parkless future).  It is not smart to be working alone, as we need collective intelligence and connection to come up with creative paths forward under either scenario.  And if the work is transactional then we will be left at the end of the day with people who feel they have either won or lost something, with the serious implications for community sustainability over time.  It seems to me that our choice is to balance advocacy and inquiry, to work primarily relationally and to engage as much as possible in a collective manner rather than by having individuals submit competing ideas.  As an individual acting in this debate I have been less influential than times when I have been part of a collective voice.

So you can see that acting in this space is not about choosing the ends of any of the axes but rather about finding a sweet spot somewhere within the sphere of action where these three dimensions are balanced against the purpose and need of action.

In general what we teach in the Art of Hosting or arts of participatory and collaborative leadership, are strategies for leading in the relational half of this sphere, biased a little towards inquiry and balancing individual and collective practice. From this base, we can move to teach more advocacy by teaching storytelling models that build relations.  We generally privilege work in the relational half of the sphere, because in general, the tactical world of change and development is not very proficient in these skills, and yet the transactional worldview is dominant in development work at the moment.  People take transactional approaches to inquiry – needs assessments, gap analysis, studies, technical modelling – and transactional approaches to advocacy – report writing, lobbying, results based funding through RFPs.  These activities are very familiar to community and organizational developers around the world.  The leading edge of balancing that practice is seeking sustainability through relational strategies that help create restorative community and long term viability, which is work we do through the Berkana Institute  All of these strategies and activities are useful, but there are times and situations in which some are more useful than at other times.

Practically applying this model should be very straightforward.  Like any good framework it comes with a caveat that you can be in multiple places in this model at the same time.  Defining and continually clarifying needs and purposes is very important.  Sensing the call of the context is also very important.  Waiting – a particular kind of active waiting, sensing the conditions and timing – is important too.

Action then proceeds using tactics and strategies that are appropriate to the times and the context.  The leadership capacity needed to use this framework well is resourcefulness and a willingness to work with others who bring complimentary skills to the effort.  It is also important that everyone remain open to mutual influence and inquiry so as to sense the best time to deploy appropriate strategies and leadership frames.  Timing and trust is very important. Used well, I can see that this framework can be a powerful tool for mapping strategies and for generating and designing new ones.

Share:

  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

1 … 19 20 21 22 23 … 44

Find Interesting Things
Events
  • Art of Hosting November 12-14, 2025, with Caitlin Frost, Kelly Poirier and Kris Archie Vancouver, Canada
  • The Art of Hosting and Reimagining Education, October 16-19, Elgin Ontario Canada, with Jenn Williams, Cédric Jamet and Troy Maracle
Resources
  • A list of books in my library
  • Facilitation Resources
  • Open Space Resources
  • Planning an Open Space Technology meeting
SIGN UP

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
  

Find Interesting Things

© 2015 Chris Corrigan. All rights reserved. | Site by Square Wave Studio

%d