My friend Eric Lillius perodically sends me cool bits and pieces. I hadn’t seen this yet though: The Web 2.0 Conversation Prisim.
More at PR 2.0.
In a post on reviewing academic articles, I was really struck by the way academics deal with surprises.
Yes, I regularly check (some) references. If the author of a (history) paper I am refereeing makes a surprising claim – e.g., something that if true I might reasonably be expected to have encountered before, not just something I know FA about – I almost instinctively check to see what his/her source is, and if it’s something I have readily to hand, may actually go to the text to see if it supports what the author concluded.
Usually it does, and I’ve learned something new.
From surprise to curiosity to learning. Straight forward enough, but how many of us dismiss surprises outright, or believe them straight away?
The Next Starbucks is an article in Architect Magazine that has several architects envision the coffee shp of the future.
There are some interesting designs here, but my favourite has to be the last one, in which the designers think first about the social nature of the coffee shop and come up with some old patterns for community use:
Merging the concept of the flexible, shared workspace with that of communal dining creates a new “third place,” a community kitchen. Anchored by a 60-foot-long wooden harvest table, a kit of parts serving different functions can be freely arranged wherever the user sees fit. The configuration of the pieces as well as the length of the table can be customized, depending on the conditions of the store. Diverse spaces are created along the table’s length; some are highly interactive while others, such as the side tables, provide more privacy.
This versatile modular system can also adapt to special functions that may happen inside the store. Its components easily detach and roll around in order to accommodate poetry readings or other large gatherings.
Friends at OSonOS and other places have been interested in the nature of a new kind of coffee shop in which conversation can be a primary function. With so little shared public space in North American cities and towns these days, it seems more and more important to pay attention to these third places.
As an aside, my local coffee shop here on Bowen Island is called The Snug. It is an important community hub, especially in the winter time when locals gather there in the mornings and afternoons and get straight on what’s going on. The previous owners were so trusting of the community that they even turned over the keys to myself and friends so we could have weekly Irish music sessions there. Those sessions continue under the new owners as well.
One of the practices I have cultivated for many years is the art of rock balancing. I was initially inspired in this by watching rock balancing artists along the waterfront in Vancouver in the mid nineties. I was amazed at the serene beauty of large rocks balanced at improbable angles.
When I began trying this for myself, I discovered that the practice is deeply reflective and highly instructive. It is a calming meditation, inviting rocks to find a balance with one another, and it is a lovely metaphor for the leadership qualities of facilitating and holding space. Often, as part of the Art of Hosting workshops I help teach, I offer rock balancing as a morning practice, to bring presence and calm to the day ahead.
If you would like to join me for an hour or two of rock balancing on Bowen Island or elsewhere, please feel free to contact me. I’m always up for play. I can also offer short workshops in conferences, gatherings and retreat.
Since 2007 I have begun taking photographs of rocks I have balanced in various places to which I have travelled. I invite you to enjoy a slide show of my collection at my flickr gallery.
Robert Paterson in an article about the future of public radio and the use of technology:
In my 2 years of work with stations it is now clear to me that technology is not the barrier to the New Media Reality that we have to reach. There are a number of barriers – none of which are mentioned in the release.
A very high barrier is cultural – a 2.0 world cannot be trained for – it has to be lived. There has to be enough people on staff who are digital natives. It is people that will make the difference not technology.
Excellent. We can only move into the worlds of connection and collaboration by doing and not training. It requires a new way of learning, that is native to some of us, but entirely foreign to others.