Chris Corrigan Menu
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me
  • Blog
  • Chaordic design
  • Resources for Facilitators
    • Facilitation Resources
    • Books, Papers, Interviews, and Videos
    • Books in my library
    • Open Space Resources
      • Planning an Open Space Technology Meeting
  • Courses
  • About Me
    • Services
      • What I do
      • How I work with you
    • CV and Client list
    • Music
    • Who I am
  • Contact me

The methodology of study from a Coast Salish perspective

April 19, 2010 By Chris Corrigan Art of Harvesting, BC, Collaboration, First Nations 2 Comments

A beautiful extended reflection on the methodology of study in a coast Salish context from author Lee Maracle:

The object of ‘study” from a Salish perspective is to discover another being in itself and for itself with the purpose of engaging it in future relationship that is mutually beneficial and based on principles of fair exchange. We study from the point of view, that there is something unknown to be discovered, that all life contains something cherished, but hidden from us and that if we observe from as many angles of perception that we can rally, engage one another in exchanging observations, and consider the internal dynamics governing the behavior of the being observed from the perspective of its perfect right to be, we will understand it in relationship with ourselves. We do not believe we can fully understand the being under study, but we can come to see it clearly enough to engage it in relationship.

This process is a collective process, requiring many different sets of eyes, many different points of view. This is because if we examine something from one subjective angle [and all human observation and thought is subjective] then we will only understand an aspect of the being under study and we are very likely to engage in huge errors, leap to absurd conclusions based on subjective assumptions and so forth. We engage one another in this process on the presumption that all points of view are valid, but they must be POINTS OF VIEW, not biases. The points of view are accepted. They are never right or wrong, just different. No argument, attempt to persuade one another is useful here and thus we do not need to compete to see who has the best eyes, the clearest vision. The process of discovery requires different points of view, different sets of images, and different perspectives about the being under examination in order for the collective to be able to discuss it’s possible internal dynamics. We first see how it moves, see how it conducts itself, mark its sense of movement, its sense of time and being, we connect its conduct to its own being and then we connect its movement to its desire, its sense of time to its longevity and its behavior to its condition and its history.”

When we do this, we come to see that the end result is a powerful story, a long lasting relationship and this fosters, beauty, hope, heart and song.

via transCanada.ca / Keynote Speakers and Other Participants.

This is a gorgeous inspiration for  the  power of collective harvesting.

Share:

  • Mastodon
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Share
  • Tweet
Skill with language, invitation and holding the centre
To free the innocent

2 Comments

  1. Dustin Rivers says:
    April 19, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    This actually gives me a bit of inspiration on how to structure the workflow for “Wa lh7áynexw” newsmagazine. Multiple viewpoints converging to express a plethora of perspectives.

    Very cool.

  2. Douglas D Germann Sr says:
    April 25, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    Chris–

    This and your comment on it touches something over which I have been puzzling the last several weeks. Perhaps you have a view that can help.

    I see that many sets of eyes are much better than one in observing and especially in creating the kind of relationship envisioned here. It is as if one set of eyes gives us two dimensions, but several gives us a three dimensional, nearly holographic, image.

    Many points of view, any number over two, in a conversation is of a different quality from two, not just of a higher magnitude.

    Here’s the difficulty: I have not been able to put my finger on why this is so. Why is a conversation of three or more points of view of a different quality, beyond mere numbers, from two points of view?

    :- Doug.

Comments are closed.

Find Interesting Things
Events
  • Art of Hosting November 12-14, 2025, with Caitlin Frost, Kelly Poirier and Kris Archie Vancouver, Canada
  • The Art of Hosting and Reimagining Education, October 16-19, Elgin Ontario Canada, with Jenn Williams, Cédric Jamet and Troy Maracle
Resources
  • A list of books in my library
  • Facilitation Resources
  • Open Space Resources
  • Planning an Open Space Technology meeting
SIGN UP

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
  

Find Interesting Things

© 2015 Chris Corrigan. All rights reserved. | Site by Square Wave Studio

%d