Some interesting links that caught my eye this week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why Black Hole Interiors Grow (Almost) Forever<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Leonard Susskind has linked the growth of black holes to increasing complexity. Is it true that the world is becoming more complex?<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt\u2019s not only black hole interiors that grow with time. The space of cosmology grows with time,\u201d he said. \u201cI think it\u2019s a very, very interesting question whether the cosmological growth of space is connected to the growth of some kind of complexity. And whether the cosmic clock, the evolution of the universe, is connected with the evolution of complexity. There, I don\u2019t know the answer.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n With a Green New Deal, here’s what the world could look like for the next generation<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the vision I have been asking for from our governments. \u00a0This vision is the one that would get me on board with using our existing oil and gas resources to manufacture and fund and infrastructure to accelerate this future for my kids. The cost of increasing fossil fuel use is so high, it needs to be accompanied by a commitment to faster transition to this kind of world. Read the whole thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why we suck at ‘solving wicked problems”<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sonja Blignault is one of the people in the world with whom I share the greatest overlap of theory and practice curiosities regarding complexity. I know this, because whenever she posts something on her blog I almost always find myself wishing I had written that! \u00a0Here’s a great post of five things we can do to disrupt thinking about problem solving to enable us to work much better with complexity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Money and technology are hugely valuable resources: \u00a0they are certaintly necessary but they are not sufficient. \u00a0Simply throwing more money and\/or more advanced technology at a problem will not make it go away. \u00a0We need to fundamentally change our thinking paradigm and approach things in context-appropriate ways, otherwise we will never move the needle on these so-called wicked problems.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n rock\/paper\/scissors and beyond<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n I miss Bernie DeKoven. Since he died earlier this year I’ve missed seeing his poetic and playful blog posts about games and fun. \u00a0Here is one from his archives about variations on rock\/paper\/scissors<\/p>\n\n\n\n The relationship between the two players is both playful and intimate. The contest is both strategic and arbitrary. There are rumors that some strategies actually work. Unless, of course, the players know what those strategies are. Sometimes, choosing a symbol at random, without logic or forethought, is strategically brilliant. Other times, it\u2019s just plain silly.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n So they play, nevertheless. Believing whatever it is that they want or need to believe about the efficacy of their strategies, knowing that there is no way to know.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n The longer they play together, the more mystical\u00a0the game becomes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n They play between mind and mindlessness. For the duration of the game, they occupy both worlds. The fun may not feel special, certainly not mystical. But the reality they are sharing is most definitely something that can only be found in play.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n